Kajian Nilai-nilai Toleransi dan Gotong Royong Pada Permainan Tradisional di Kabupaten Sumenep
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58790/jissh.v3i2.39Keywords:
Traditional games, tolerance, mutual cooperation, SumenepAbstract
The existence of traditional games has indirectly shown the public the cultural results of a community group. Traditional games are a reflection of people's behavior in building their civilization. Remembering that traditional games have a basis in local culture or local wisdom that exists in the community itself. Traditional games, also known as folk games, are a recreational activity that not only aims to entertain oneself, but also as a tool to maintain social relationships and comfort in society. It is correct to say that play is a necessity for children, so that children gain value and progress in the development of daily life. Through traditional games, the values of tolerance are introduced and instilled in individuals. Instilling the values of tolerance through traditional games will be fun and not boring. The terminology "gotong royong" comes from Javanese, namely the word gotong which means to shoulder and the word royong which means to be together. The combination of the words gotong royong, if interpreted entirely, means working together to complete a particular activity involving joint activities. The method used in the research is a qualitative method. Qualitative methods are research procedures that produce descriptive data, speech or writing and observable behavior from people (the subjects themselves).
References
Badan Perpustakaan dan KearsipanProvinsi Jawa Timur. 1991. Nilai Budaya Dalam Permainan Rakyat Madura- Jawa timur. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, DirektoratJenderalKebudayaan, Direktorat Sejarah dan Nilai Tradisional, ProyekInventarisasi dan Pembinaan Nilai-nilaiBudaya, Jakarta.
George Ritzer. 2004. Sosiologi Ilmu Pengetahuan Berparadigma Ganda. Jakarta. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Hasyim, Umar. 1979. Toleransi dan Kemerdekaan Beragama dalam Islam Sebagai Dasar Menuju Kerukunan Antar Umat Beragama. Bina Ilmu. Surabaya.
Jonathan H. Turner. 1998. The StructureofSociologicalTheory. USA. WadsworthPublishing Company
Koentjaraningrat. 2004. Kebudayaan, Mentalitas dan Pembangunan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.
Kurniawan, AroWibowo. 2019. OlahragadanPermainanTradisional. Wineka Media. Malang.
Muhammad Basrowi. 2004. Teori Sosial Dalam Tiga Paradigma. Surabaya. UK Press.
Norman K. Denzin dan Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2009. HandbookofQualitativeResearch. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.
Safei, Agus Ahmad. 2020. SosiologiToleransi :Kontestasi, Akomodasi, Harmoni. Deepublish Publisher. Sleman.
Walgito, Bimo. 2003. PsikologiSosial. Andi Offset. Yogyakarta.
Jurnal :
Tom Donoghue and Keith Punch Ed (2003, p.44) dalamAsepSudarsyah. KerangkaAnalisis Data Fenomenologi (ContohAnalisis Teks SebuahCatatanHarian). JurnalPenelitian Pendidikan, Vol. 14 No. 1, April 2013.
MoustakasdalamAsepSudarsyah. KERANGKA ANALISIS DATA FENOMENOLOGI(ContohAnalisis Teks SebuahCatatan Harian). ISSN 1412-565 X.
						
							
